Fairness Concerns About Proliferation of SEC Administrative Prosecutions Documented by Wall Street Journal

If you haven’t read Jean Eaglesham’s article in the May 7, 2015 Wall Street Journal about the SEC’s administrative enforcement prosecutions, you should.  SEC Wins With In-House Judges: Agency prevails against around 90% of defendants when it sends cases to its administrative law judge sheds new light on what is increasingly being recognized as an abusive use of the SEC’s captive administrative law courts to prosecute complex securities enforcement cases and impose debilitating life-changing penalties without giving respondents a fair shake.  Ms. Eaglesham centers her piece around the ongoing SEC administrative action against Timbervest LLC and its officers, which happens to be the case discussed just yesterday in the Securities Diary Straight Arrow blog: Briefing of ALJ Constitutionality Before SEC Leaves Resolution in Doubt.

The article points out that the SEC has not so mysteriously increased its use of the administrative courts in apparent response to losing more cases in its federal court enforcement actions.  (The SEC’s Director of the Division of Enforcement admitted that they chose a forum based on the desire to win and to pressure their targets into settlement.)  The federal court actions allow the accused to present a defense to real folks, not administrative judges, who happen to be chosen by, work within, and report to, the SEC itself.  (Ms. Eaglesham quotes Judge Jed Rakoff: “The SEC appoints the judges, the SEC pays the judges, they are subject to appeal to the SEC.  That can create an appearance issue, even if the judges are excellent, as I have every reason to believe they are.”)  There are no standards that cabin SEC discretion to choose when it can deprive an accused of a jury trial simply by choosing to use the administrative court.  This presents obvious Seventh Amendment issues, as well as arbitrariness issues under the Administrative Procedure Act, that no court has yet addressed.  Indeed, the SEC is actively trying to prevent federal courts from addressing these issues, and so far has been successful.

Ms. Eaglesham also reports, to my knowledge for the first time, about internal pressures on SEC administrative law judges to side with the SEC or be accused of a lack of “loyalty”:

One former SEC judge said she thought the system was slanted against defendants at times. Lillian McEwen, who was an SEC judge from 1995 to 2007, said she came under fire from Ms. Murray for finding too often in favor of defendants.

“She questioned my loyalty to the SEC,” Ms. McEwen said in an interview, adding that she retired as a result of the criticism.

Ms. McEwen said the SEC in-house judges were expected to work on the assumption that “the burden was on the people who were accused to show that they didn’t do what the agency said they did.”

This is a grave charge that needs independent investigation.  If true, it would raise serious due process issues.  It certainly provides sufficient grounds for the SEC to be subjected to discovery in a federal court action seeking to prevent the SEC from imposing sanctions in a court infected with inherent bias, if the SEC’s efforts to prevent such an action from going forward can be overcome.

Ms. Eaglesham has done us a service by exposing the SEC’s festering sore to the open air.  We can only hope that a little sunlight will penetrate the SEC’s defensive shell and allow a full and fair consideration of the serious issues being raised.

Straight Arrow

May 7, 2015

Contact Straight Arrow privately here, or leave a public comment below:

Advertisements

12 thoughts on “Fairness Concerns About Proliferation of SEC Administrative Prosecutions Documented by Wall Street Journal

  1. Pingback: Upon Further Review, SEC Memo on Use of Administrative Courts Was Indeed a Fumble | Securities Diary

  2. Pingback: SEC ALJ James Grimes Issues Important Discovery Order Against SEC | Securities Diary

  3. Pingback: SEC Broadens Constitutional Inquiry into Its Own Administrative Judges in Timbervest Case | Securities Diary

  4. Pingback: SEC “Invites” ALJ Cameron Elliot To Provide Affidavit on Conversations “Similar” to Those Described by Former ALJ | Securities Diary

  5. Pingback: SEC ALJ Cameron Elliot Declines To Submit Affidavit “Invited” by the Commission | Securities Diary

  6. Pingback: Timbervest Files Complaint and TRO Motion To Halt SEC Proceeding | Securities Diary

  7. Pingback: SEC, Desperate To Avoid Judge May, Challenges Related Case Designation in Timbervest Action | Securities Diary

  8. Pingback: SEC Bumbles Efforts To Figure Out How Its Own Administrative Law Judges Were Appointed | Securities Diary

  9. Pingback: SEC Inspector General Reveals Investigation into Possible Bias of SEC ALJs | Securities Diary

  10. Pingback: SEC Proposes Amended Rules of Practice in Recognition of Unfair Procedures | Securities Diary

  11. Pingback: Why the SEC’s Proposed Changes to Its Rules of Practice Are Woefully Inadequate — Part I | Securities Diary

  12. Pingback: Why the SEC’s Proposed Changes to Its Rules of Practice Are Woefully Inadequate — Part II | Securities Diary

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s